Língua escrita e língua real: o que um corpus oral permite descobrir

Autores/as

  • José Teixeira Universidad del Miño, Braga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/SI.13.2014.13.38

Palabras clave:

oral language, written language, interjections, norm, pragmatics

Resumen

THE WRITTEN LANGUAGE AND THE REAL LANGUAGE: WHAT AN ORAL CORPUS CAN REVEAL

Starting from an extensive oral corpus which is being collected, this paper focuses on how the oral language allows us to realize what languages really are and how they work beyond the formalized written dimension. It is our claim to show that it is language in use that better highlights many aspects which are impossible to understand only by an analysis of the traditional “linguistic system”. So we will verify how oral speech really performs sentences and its lexical and pragmatic elements.

PlumX Metrics of this article

Citas

Ameka, F. (1992), “Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech”, Journal of Pragmatics, 18, Amsterdam, pp. 101‑118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90048-G
Google Scholar

Ameka, F. (1994), “Interjections”, em: Asher, R. E. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. 4, Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 1712‑1714.
Google Scholar

Araújo Carreira, M.H. (ed.) (2012), Les rapports entre l’oral e l’écrit dans les langues romanes, Université Paris 8 Vincennes‑Saint‑Denis, Paris.
Google Scholar

Gibbs Jr., R.W. (2003), “Embodied experience and linguistic meaning”, Brain and language, 84, Edmonton, pp. 1‑15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00517-5
Google Scholar

Johnson, D.J. (1993), “Relationships between oral and written language”, School Psychology Review, 22, 4, Bethesda, pp. 595‑609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1993.12085676
Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (1995), “Embodied Minds and Meanings”, em: Baumgartner, P., Payr, S. (eds.), Speaking Minds – Interviews with Twenty Eminent Cognitive Scientists, Princeton University Press, Princeton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400863969.115
Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1999), Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought, Basic Books, New York.
Google Scholar

Norrick, N.R. (2009), “Interjections as pragmatic markers”, Journal of Pragmatics, 41, Amsterdam, pp. 866‑891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.005
Google Scholar

Saussure, F., de (1978), Curso de Linguística Geral, D. Quixote, Lisboa.
Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, A. (1992), “The semantics of interjection”, Journal of Pragmatics, 18, 2‑3, Amsterdam, pp. 159‑192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90050-L
Google Scholar

Wilkins, D.P. (1992), “Interjections as deictics”, Journal of Pragmatics, 18, 2‑3, Amsterdam, pp. 119‑158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90049-H
Google Scholar

Descargas

Publicado

2014-12-30

Cómo citar

Teixeira, José. 2014. «Língua Escrita E língua Real: O Que Um Corpus Oral Permite Descobrir». Studia Iberystyczne 13 (diciembre):487-506. https://doi.org/10.12797/SI.13.2014.13.38.

Número

Sección

Linguística, didática e estudos de tradução